Adaptive routing
This page explains the routing layer: how each answer changes the next learning move.
Learning engine
mastery graph + memory schedule + parent signals
Prereq
mastered
Core skill
review
Reasoning
solid
Next concept
ready
Exam fluency
future
adaptive decision
Review the core skill, then unlock reasoning
spaced review
D7
D14
D25
D50
D75
parent evidence
teacher layer
Designed by IITians with real teachers.
Answer-to-action router
Answer evidence
Wrong for a reason
The response is treated as a signal, not a dead end.
Review memory
Repair prerequisite
Teach clearer example
Raise difficulty
The problem
Two children can get the same answer wrong for different reasons. One needs a prerequisite repair; another needs a clearer example; a third needs a harder reasoning prompt.
The mechanism
Accuracy, misconception patterns, recent review history, and concept dependencies all influence whether the next move should teach, test, repair, or advance.
The parent view
Parents see the selected focus and reason instead of a flood of raw analytics.
What this creates
signal
Misconception handling
This signal appears in the learning path, review rhythm, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Review versus repair
This signal appears in the learning path, review rhythm, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Difficulty adjustment
This signal appears in the learning path, review rhythm, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Next best step
This signal appears in the learning path, review rhythm, or parent evidence surface.
Parent takeaway
Your child gets the next useful task, not just the next item in a worksheet.
Keep exploring
Mastery engine
The mastery engine checks whether the student can use the idea before moving forward.
Memory schedule
Fragile concepts return before they fade from memory.
Knowledge graph
Every skill is connected to prerequisites and future concepts, so gaps become visible.
