Memory schedule
The Spacing Effect
Cepeda et al., 2006. A parent-friendly explanation of what the research says and how it shaped SuperLearnΣr.
Learning engine
mastery graph + memory schedule + parent signals
Prereq
mastered
Core skill
review
Reasoning
solid
Next concept
ready
Exam fluency
future
adaptive decision
Review the core skill, then unlock reasoning
spaced review
D7
D14
D25
D50
D75
sample parent evidence
teacher layer
Designed by IITians with real teachers.
What the study tells us
Distributed practice across days and weeks is more reliable for long-term memory than cramming practice into one sitting.
Why parents should care
Revision should not depend on a parent remembering what to bring back. The system should keep fragile ideas alive automatically.
How it shaped the product
What SuperLearnΣr changes because of this evidence.
This is where research becomes architecture: the study influences the rules, screens, and parent signals.
01
Important concepts return on a spaced review schedule.
02
Review is selected from evidence of fragility, not from a generic worksheet.
03
The parent experience shows what is coming back and why.
What parents see
Product signals built from the study.
The research is visible in the product through concrete signals, not hidden behind slogans.
signal
D7/D14/D25 reviews
Shown as part of the learning path, review plan, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Fragile concept queue
Shown as part of the learning path, review plan, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Weekly review focus
Shown as part of the learning path, review plan, or parent evidence surface.